4 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 95 OF 2006 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 4 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 95 OF 2006 IN WP/5495/2005 Vidya D/o. Gaurishankar Joshi Versus State Of Maharashtra And Others __________________________________________________________ • None appears for the Petitioner • Mr. N. B. Patil, A.G.P. for State • Adv. B. A. Darak for Respondent No. 3 - Absent • Adv. A. D. Kasliwal for Respondent No. 4 - Absent __________________________________________________________ CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ. DATE : OCTOBER 05, 2026 PER COURT : 1) None for the petitioner. 2) It appears that this petition is of the year 2006 and direction was given to the management to pay the salary of the petitioner from November 2004 till the date of passing of the order under contempt. 3) However, the record shows that after pursuing the matter for some time, the petitioner failed to circulate the matter after 2008. Today also, she remains absent. 4) Considering the old nature of the petition and the conduct of the petitioner, there is reason to infer that Komal Kamble Page| 1 of 2 2026:BHC-AUG:47051 4 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 95 OF 2006 the management must have paid the salary to the petitioner. 5) In view of the above and with the passage of time, nothing survives in the present contempt petition and the same accordingly stands disposed of. (VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV) JUDGE (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE Komal Kamble Page| 2 of 2