1 6.CP-667-2025.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONT. PETITION NO. 667 OF 2025 IN AO/19/2025 DEEPAK S/O LAXMAN DAWKHAR AND OTHERS VERSUS VAISHALI W/O SHIVRAM SATHE AND ANOTHER … Advocate for the Petitioners : Mr. Bhrhate Yuvraj R AGP for Respondents/State : Ms. R. R. Tandale Advocate for Respondent No. 1 : Mr. Narwade Vinayak P, … CORAM : ROHIT W. JOSHI, J. DATE : 1st OCTOBER 2026 PER COURT : 1. The present petition is filed contending that, by selling the suit property, Respondent No. 2 has committed wilful and deliberate contempt of the order dated 05.05.2025 passed by this Court in Civil Application No. 5199 of 2025 in Appeal from Order No. 19 of 2025. 2. By the aforesaid order, this Court stayed the execution and operation of the judgment and decree dated 13.03.2025 passed in Regular Civil Appeal No. 01 of 2024 by the learned District Judge, Srirampur, District Ahmednagar. The said interim order does not amount to an order of injunction restraining the creation of third- party rights or interests in the suit property. 3. In view of the aforesaid, the execution of the sale deed 2026:BHC-AUG:46346 2 6.CP-667-2025.doc dated 01.08.2025 in respect of the suit property by Respondent No. 2 cannot be construed as an act constituting contempt of the aforesaid order. The Contempt Petition is therefore dismissed. 4. It will be open for the Petitioner to take recourse to such appropriate legal remedies as may be available in law for ventilating his grievances. ROHIT W. JOSHI JUDGE NAJEEB..