2026:JHHC:16462 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 2147 of 2026 Aarif Hussain @ Aarif Khan @ Arif Hussain, S/o Mandip Rajak … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party --- CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Shailesh Kr. Singh, Advocate : Mr. Prakhar Kr. Vishain, Advocate For the Victim : Mr. Kunal Chandra Suman, Advocate For the State : Mr. Azeemuddin, APP --- 06/09.06.2026 Heard the learned counsels appearing on behalf of the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 15.07.2025 in connection with Dhanbad P.S. Case No. 145 of 2025, registered under Section 87 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, now pending in the court of learned CJM, Dhanbad. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and the petitioner as well as victim were working together in a company and there was love affair between them. He submits that ultimately, they also got married in Masjid and thereafter, the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner has also submitted that as per the First Information Report itself, the petitioner and the victim had run away with Rs. 50,000/- cash and jewellery from the house. 5. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the victim, on the other hand, has opposed the prayer for bail and has submitted that the petitioner had introduced himself as Mukesh Kumar and also told the victim that he was bachelor and established physical relationship with the victim on the pretext of marriage. However, subsequently the religion of the petitioner was found to be different and he was found to be already married. The statement of the victim has been recorded in the case-diary at paragraph 87. 6. After hearing the learned counsels for the parties and 2026:JHHC:16462 2 considering the nature of allegation and the false disclosures made by the petitioner to establish physical relationship with the victim, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail and hence, this bail application is rejected. 7. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the learned court concerned through “FAX/email”. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Date of Order:09.06.2026 Pankaj Date of Uploading:10.06.2026