RAMNA DEVI Versus SAGAR CHAND AND ANR CRMPM-345 of 2026 17.07.2026 Present: Ms. Shikha Rajta, Legal Aid Counsel, for the applicant/petitioner. Mr. Vivek Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No.1. Mr. Rajan Kahol & Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocates General, with Mr. Ravi Chauhan and Mr. Anish Banshtu, Deputy Advocates General, for State. ASI Vivek Sharma, PS Sujanpur, District Hamirpur, present in person along with record. CRMPM-345 of 2026 By way of instant application filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, prayer has been made on behalf of the applicant/petitioner for condonation of delay in maintaining the accompanying petition, which is barred by limitation. Though by way of filing reply/status report, prayer made on behalf of the applicant/petitioner has been opposed on the ground that no plausible explanation has been rendered on record qua inordinate delay in filing the petition, however, having carefully perused the averments contained in the application, which is duly supported by an affidavit, this Court is convinced and satisfied that delay in maintaining the accompanying petition is neither intentional nor deliberate, rather same has occurred on account of the circumstances, which were completely beyond the control of the applicant/petitioner and as such, delay in filing the petition, which in my considered view has been sufficiently explained, is condoned. The application stands disposed of. Cr. Revision No._______ of 2026 Be registered. List for admission on 29.07.2026, as prayed for. July 17, 2026 (Sandeep Sharma), (Rajeev Raturi) Judge