VIKASH KUMAR GUPTA AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
NA528/41666/2026 · 2026-10-06
Saurabh Srivastava
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 15895 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 15895 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 41666 of 2026 Court No. - 76 HON'BLE SAURABH SRIVASTAVA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for parties.
2. Present application has been preferred with the prayer to quash the chargesheet dated 27.8.2023 and cognizance/summoning order dated 4.1.2024 as well as entire proceedings of Case no. 53 of 2024 (State of U.P. vs. Vikash Kumar and another) arising out of Case Crime no. 199 of 2023, under Sections 147, 323, 324, 504, 506, 452 IPC, P.S.- George Twon, District Allahabad, pending in the court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court no. 7, Allahabad.
3. On perusal of the narration of FIR as well as impugned order and chargesheet, this Court does not find it to be a case where interference of this Court is required. No such ground appears to be available in the present application, on the basis of which, impugned order, chargesheet and entire proceeding, can be set aside.
4. Accordingly, the prayer sought through the instant application, is refused.
5. Lastly, learned counsel for applicants has submitted that liberty may be granted to applicants to surrender before the court concerned and apply for bail to which learned AGA has no objection.
6. In view of the aforesaid, the instant application is finally disposed of with a direction to the court concerned that in case, the applicants surrender before the court concerned within a period of 15 days from today and apply Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Krishna Kant Upadhyay Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Vikash Kumar Gupta And Another .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s)
for bail and if there is no other legal impediment before court concerned, their bail application shall be considered and decided expeditiously in accordance with law laid down in the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another (2022 SCC OnLine SC 825).
7. However, it is made clear that till 15 days from today, no coercive action shall be taken against applicants herein in pursuance of aforesaid case. October 7, 2026 Shaswat NA528 No. 41666 of 2026 2 (Saurabh Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHASWAT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad