MANOHAR LAL MEENA SON OF SHRI VISHRAM MEENA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/935/2026 · 2026-01-20
Pramil Kumar Mathur
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 15890 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 15890 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:2435] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Interim) Bail Application No. 935/2026 Manohar Lal Meena Son Of Shri Vishram Meena, Aged About 26 Years, Resident Of Jhalatala, Tehsil And Police Station Laxmangarh, District Alwar (Raj.) (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Central Jail Alwar) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajendra Singh Rajawat with Mr. Amitabh Jatav For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP Mr. Rinesh Gupta Mr. Sarwat Alam HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR
Order 20/01/2026
1. The present interim bail application under Section 483 of BNSS has been filed by the petitioner who has been arrested in the present matter arising out of FIR No.176/2024 registered at P.S. Narayanpura, District Kotputli Behror for offences under Sections 191(2), 190, 115(2), 126(2), 109(1), 103(2) and 191(3) of BNS, 2023.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor as well as learned counsel for the complainant and perused the material available on record.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present interim bail application has been filed on the ground that the petitioner’s wife was pregnant and her delivery was expected on
31.01.2026. However, due to premature labour, she delivered the child on 14.01.2026. It is further submitted that the petitioner
[2026:RJ-JP:2435] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-935/2026] also has a girl child aged about 1½ years. In view of the aforesaid circumstances, the petitioner is required to take care of his wife and minor children and to discharge his parental duties. Hence, it is prayed that the present interim bail application may kindly be allowed.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor and learned counsel for the complainant have vehemently opposed the bail application.
5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in the light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of interim bail to the petitioner for a limited period.
6. Accordingly, the interim bail application filed under Section 483 of BNSS is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Manohar Lal Meena Son Of Shri Vishram Meena, be released on interim bail for a period of 15 (fifteen) days, subject to the condition that he shall furnish a personal bond in a sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of Superintendent of Central Jail for his surrender on completion of 15 (fifteen) days from the date of actual release. It is further directed that on being released, the petitioner shall not try to contact in any manner with complainant and also shall not enter the area of the complainant's residence/house. If the petitioner fails to surrender after the expiry of interim bail period, the authorities shall be at liberty to proceed against him in accordance with law.
(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Chandan/229