1 / 2026:CGHC:4914 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 1001 of 2026 Mamta Chaube W/o Shri Amit Vikram Chaube Aged About 47 Years Working As Teacher (Lb) (E-Cadre) At Government Middle School, Changorabhata (East), Block Dharsiwa, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - The Director Directorate Of Public Instruction Indravati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3 - The District Education Officer Raipur, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 4 - The Block Education Officer Dharsiwa, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. R.K. Verma, Advocate For Respondents- State : Mrs. Diksha Gauraha, Deputy Govt. Advocate S.B.: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge Order on Board 29/01/2026 1. Petitioner has filed this writ petition, seeking following reliefs:- ALFIZA BAIG Digitally signed by ALFIZA BAIG Date: 2026.01.30 15:06:49 +0530 2 / “10.1 This Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to pass an appropriate order or issue writ and direct the respondent authorities to correct the seniority list by counting the service of the petitioner from the initial date of appointment and further direct the respondent authority to prepare the fresh seniority list, in the interest of justice. 10.2 This Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to pass an appropriate order or issue writ and direct the respondents to decide the representation dated 08.01.2026 of the petitioner within stipulated time, in the interest of justice. 10.3 This Hon’ble Court may further be pleased to pass an appropriate order or issue writ as deemed fit under the facts and circumstances of the case.” 2. After arguing for sometime, counsel for petitioner submits that as petitioner has already submitted representation before respondent no. 3 and 4 on 18.01.2026 which is pending consideration, therefore, direction be issued to respondent no. 3 and 4 to take decision on pending representation at the earliest within specified time frame. 3. Learned counsel for State submits that in view of limited prayer made by learned counsel for petitioner, she is having no objection. 4. On due consideration of submission made by learned counsel for respective parties, without commenting any thing on the merits of the case, I find it appropriate to dispose of this writ petition at this stage directing respondent no. 3 and 4 to consider and take decision on pending representation accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a further period of 04 months from the date of receipt of the order passed by this Court. 5. With the aforesaid observation and direction, this writ petition is disposed of. Certified copy as per rules. sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Alfiza