Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15890 (ALL)

GUFRAN AHMAD ANSARI v. STATE OF U.P.

BAIL/36152/2026 · 2026-10-08

Krishan Pahal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 36152 of 2026 Court No. - 68 HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J. 1. List has been revised. 2. Heard Sri Saurabh Tripathi, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Deepak Kumar Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material placed on record. 3. Applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No.117 of 2026, U/S 9B, 9C Explosives Act, 1884, U/S 4(b) Explosive Substances Act, 1908, U/S 5/25 Arms Act, 1958 & U/S 288 B.N.S. Police Station Heeempur Deepa, District Bijnor, during the pendency of trial. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant has argued that the applicant is a labourer at Bajrang Fire Works and has been falsely implicated in the present case. The allegations are per se false. The actual allegation is that the said factory was having explosives in excess of the allocated quantity. The applicant has no criminal history and is in jail since 13.09.2026. He undertakes to cooperate with the trial and not misuse the liberty of bail. 5. Learned A.G.A. has vehemently opposed the bail application but the submissions raised by the learned counsel for the applicant could not be disputed. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the evidence on record, and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, prima-facie the Court is of Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Saurabh Tripathi, Shantanu Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Gufran Ahmad Ansari .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed. 7. Let the applicant- Gufran Ahmad Ansari, be released on bail in the aforementioned case crime on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to verification of sureties, with the conditions that he shall not tamper with evidence or intimidate witnesses and shall appear before the trial court as required. 8. Breach of any condition shall entail cancellation of bail. The observations herein shall not affect the trial on merits. October 9, 2026 (Ravi Kant) BAIL No. 36152 of 2026 2 (Krishan Pahal,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAVI KANT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad