SUMAN TRIMBAK DOLE v. BHAUSAHEB SAKARAM KHILARI AND OTHERS
CA/8475/2026 · 2026-08-11
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1589 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1589 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
( 1 )
936 CA 8475 OF 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 936 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8475 OF 2026 IN WP/1154/2024 SUMAN TRIMBAK DOLE VERSUS BHAUSAHEB SAKARAM KHILARI AND OTHERS ... Mr. Tushar Kale h/f. Mr. S. R. Andhale, Advocate for Applicant Mr. S. S. Kotkar, Advocate for Respondent No.1 … CORAM : AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J. DATE : 11.08.2026 PER COURT :- . Heard. The writ petition came to be dismissed for want of taking appropriate steps as directed by this Court vide order dated 30.04.2026. The present Civil Application is filed seeking recall of the said order. There is delay of 19 days in filing the Civil Application. The petitioner undertakes to supply the correct addresses of the unserved respondents within a period of four weeks from today or to take appropriate steps to serve the unserved respondents within the said period. The undertaking is accepted.
2. The delay of 19 days caused in filing the Civil Application stands condoned. The Writ Petition stands restored to its original position to the extent that the directions in order dated 30.04.2026 dismissing the petition 2026:BHC-AUG:35279
( 2 )
936 CA 8475 OF 2026 stand recalled.
3. If fresh/correct addresses are supplied by the petitioner in the given time, office to issue notice to the unserved respondents, returnable on
25.08.2026.
4. Civil Application stands disposed of.
[AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J.] PRW