Page No.# 1/4 GAHC010151432025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/2212/2025 SABITA TALUKDAR ALIAS DEVI D/O. LT. UPENDRA NATH TALUKDAR AND W/O. SRI ADITYA DEKA, R/O. JONAKI PATH JANAKPUR, KAHILIPARA, GUWAHATI-781019, DIST. KAMRUP (M), ASSAM. 2: ON THE DEATH OF SRI BHUPENDRA MOHAN TALUKDAR HIS LEGAL HEIRS AND SUCCESSORS NAMELY 2.1: PHULESWARI TALUKDAR W/O. LT. BHUPENDRA MOHAN 2.2: RITA MANJARI TALUKDAR D/O. LT. BHUPENDRA MOHAN 2.3: DEEPA MANJARI TALUKDAR D/O. LT. BHUPENDRA MOHAN ALL ARE R/O. RAJGARH ANIL NAGA GUWAHATI-781024 DIST. KAMRUP (M) ASSAM. 3: KABINDRA MOHAN TALUKDAR S/O/ LT. CHANDRAMOHAN TALUKDAR R/O. VILL. BUDARURTUP MOUZA-BARPETA DIST. BARPETA ASSAM PIN-781301 VERSUS Page No.# 2/4 ON THE DEATH OF PURNIMA DEKA HIS LEGAL HEIRS 1.1:PRATIVA DEKA W/O. PRAHLAD DAS R/O. ISSAPURHATI BARPETA MOUZA-BARPETA DIST. BARPETA ASSAM PIN-781314. PRESENT ADDRESS 2ND FLOOR DISHANT REGENCY PRAGOTI PATH JANAKPUR KAHILIPARA NEAR JOURNALIST COLONY PO KAHILIPARA SO GUWAHATI 781019 DIST KAMRUP M ASSAM 1.2:BINITA DEKA W/O. JITU DAS R/O. VILL.- PATBAUSHI DIST. BARPETA ASSAM PIN-781314. 2:PADMA DEKA S/O. LT. KHARGADHAR DEKA 3:SRINATH DEKA S/O. LT. PUSPA DEKA. NO. 2 AND 3 ARE R/O. VILL.- SUNDARIDIA (BUDARURTUP SUNDARIDIA ROAD) MOUZA-BARPETA DIST. BARPETA ASSAM PIN-781314. 4:HARINATH DEKA S/O. LT PUSPA DEKA R/O. VILL.- DOLAIGAON P/O. BONGAIGAON DIST. BONGAIGAON ASSAM Page No.# 3/4 PIN-783380 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR Z MUKIT, MR. A SATTAR,S CHOUDHURY,MR. WASIM HOQUE Advocate for the Respondent : S A BAKHTIAR, MR K JAIN(R-2,3),S A BAKHTIAR(R-2,3) BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MRIDUL KUMAR KALITA ORDER 05.10.2026 1. Heard Mr. W Hoque, learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Mr. SA Bakhtiar, learned counsel for all the respondents. 2. This interlocutory application was filed by the applicant under Order VI Rule 14A(2), (3) & (4) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, praying for allowing the petitioner to take steps upon the respondent No. 1 (i) in the connected RSA 51/2025 and IA (Civil) No. 1322/2025 at new address, which was not mentioned in the record. However, the learned counsel for the applicant submits that since the respondent No. 1 (i) has already appeared in the connected RSA, this interlocutory application has become infructuous. 3. Considering the prayer and that the respondent No. 1 (i) has appeared in the connected RSA 51/2025, this Interlocutory Application has become infructuous. Page No.# 4/4 4. As such, same is dismissed on being infructuous. JUDGE Comparing Assistant