Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15887 (BOM)

M/S JAIHIND CONSTRUCTION THROUGH PROPRIETOR v. MANOJ SAUNIK AND OTHERS

CP/331/2020 · 2026-10-01

Contempt Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

(1) 910 CP-331.2020.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 910 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 331 OF 2020 IN WP/5277/2019 M/S JAIHIND CONSTRUCTION THROUGH PROPRIETOR VERSUS MANOJ SAUNIK AND OTHERS --------------------------------------------------------------------------- None for the petitioner. Mr. A.S. Shinde, A.G.P. for State. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ. DATED : 1st October, 2026 Per Court : 1. Though the learned counsel for the petitioner is no more, but the learned AGP, on instructions, submits that out of the amount of Rs. 50,10,000/-, the amount of Rs. 20,00,000/- is already paid to the petitioner and so far as the remaining amount of Rs. 30,10,000/- is concerned, a demand for getting the said amount is already raised. It was also undertaken that as and when the amount is received, it will be paid to the petitioner immediately. The communication dated 02.02.2021 is also placed on record to that effect. 2. Under such circumstances, there is a scope to infer that by the passage of time the remaining amount must have been paid to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of. (VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV) (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE JUDGE VD_Dhirde