Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15882 (JHR)

SUBODH KUMAR GOPE @ SUBODH GOPE @ SUBODH KUMAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./2930/2026 · 2026-06-09

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:16415 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 2930 of 2026 ------ 1. Subodh Kumar Gope @ Subodh Gope @ Subodh Kumar, aged about 41 years, son of Binod Gope 2. Ankit Kumar Pathak, aged about 23 years, son of Shailendra Pathak @ Shailendra Kumar Pathak 3. Mithalesh Kumar @ Mithlesh Kumar, aged about 46 years, son of Binod Gope All are residents of Bishunpur, P.O. and P.S. Dhanbad, District Dhanbad, Jharkhand .... .... …. Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI For the Petitioners : Mr. Ramchander Sahu, Advocate For the State : Mr. Praful Jojo, A.P.P. ------ 02/09.06.2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. 2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Dhanbad P.S. Case No. 71 of 2026, registered for the offence under Sections 190, 191(2), 126(2), 115(2), 109(1) and 303(2) of Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, pending in the court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dhanbad. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the altercation took place due to land dispute and there are general and omnibus allegation of assault. He next submits that the injury is found to be simple. He also submits that the petitioners are having no criminal antecedent as disclosed in para 14 of the petition. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer and submits that the allegation of assault are there. 5. Looking to the contents of the FIR, it transpires that there are general and omnibus allegation of assault against the petitioners and further injury is found to be simple and petitioners have got no criminal antecedent as disclosed in para 14 of the petition, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 6. Accordingly, the above-named petitioners are directed to surrender before the learned court within two weeks from today and in the event of their arrest or surrender, they shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dhanbad, in connection with Dhanbad P.S. Case No. 71 of 2026, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Anit Uploaded 10.06.2026