[2026:RJ-JP:6628] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 93/2025 1. Lokesh Kumar Namdev S/o Shri Vishnu Shankar Namdev, Aged About 36 Years, Post-Peon Pasar Mohlla Ward No. 7 Chhipabarod Dist. Baran (Raj) 2. Chatanya Prakash Jain S/o Shri Vikram Singh Jain, Aged About 52 Years, Post-L.d.c. Sabji Mandi Ke Pass Chhipabarod Dist. Baran (Raj) 3. Shekhar Kumar Samaria S/o Shri Naval Kishore Samaria, Aged About 50 Years, Post-Computer Lab Assistant Chhipo Ke Bade Mandir Ke Pass Chhipabarod Dist. Baran (Raj) 4. Babu Khan S/o Shri Iqbal Ahmed, Aged About 51 Years, Post-Peon Koli Mohlla Ward No.19 Chhipabarod Dist. Baran (Raj) 5. Suresh Kumar S/o Shri Ram Chandar, Aged About 35 Years, Post-Peon Villgesukhneri Post Bilendi Chhipabarod Dist. Baran (Raj) 6. Atik Ahmed S/o Shri Rafik Ahmed, Aged About 45 Years, Post-Peon Govt. Hospital Ke Samne Chhipabarod Dist. Baran (Raj) 7. Girish Gour S/o Shri Bhanwar Lal Gour, Aged About 39 Years, Post. Peon Station Road Jain Dhrmshala Ke Pass Chhabra Dist Baran (Raj) 8. Hari Ram Gurjar S/o Shri Kanwar Lal Gurjar, Aged About 35 Years, Post. Chokidar Harnawda Jagir Chhipabarod Dist. Baran (Raj) 9. Smt. Mithilesh Kumari Malav W/o Shri Satyanaryan Malav, Aged About 45 Years, Post- Computer Oppretor Chetram Ji Meena Ke Piche, Salpura Road, Chhipabarod Dist. Baran (Raj) ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Higher Education Government Of Jaipur (Raj.). 2. Dr. Om Prakash Bairwa, Commissioner, Department Of College Education Radha Krishna Shiksha Sankul Jln [2026:RJ-JP:6628] (2 of 2) [CCP-93/2025] Marg, Jaipur. 3. M. Ikram Ameen, Dy. Secretary, Department Of Higher Education (Group-3). Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Aditya Pancholi For Respondent(s) : Ms. Ritika Naruka for Mr. S S Naruka, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 12/02/2026 It is informed by learned counsel for the respondents that after deciding the representation petitioner has already been granted appointment as prayed. Learned counsel for the petitioner do not controvert the fact. Accordingly, the instant civil contempt petition has become infructuous and the same is disposed of. The rule is discharged. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J ashu /22