Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5301 of 2026 ====================================================== Ravi Shankar Kumar Son of Kalanand Das, Resident of Village-Ram Nagar Shahpur, Ward no.3, Anchal- Gwalpara, P.S.- Gwalpara, District-Madhepura. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus
1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Forest Department of Environment and Forest, Government of Bihar, Patna.
2. Principal Chief Conservator of Forest, Bihar, Patna.
3. The Chairman, State Level Committee of Wood Based Industries Bihar cum Principal Chief Conservator of Forest, Bihar, Patna.
4. The District Magistrate, Madhepura.
5. The Licencing Officer cum Divisional Forest Officer, Sahara Forest Division, Saharsa.
6. The Deputy Secretary to the Government, Department of Forest and Environment, Government of Bihar.
7. The Ranger of Forest, Range Office Uda Kishunganj, Madhepura, P.S.-Uda- Kishunganj, District-Madhepura.
8. Kartik Mehta, M/S Durga Trading (Saw Mill) Company Shahpur, Son of Ram Krishna Mehta, Resident of Village-Shahpur, Gwalpara, P.S.-Gwalpara, District- Madhepura. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ratan Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr.Standing Counsel (15) ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 2 14-05-2026
Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for and is allowed to implead the Bihar State Pollution Control Board as respondent no.09 in course of the day.
2. Heard the parties.
3. The present petition has been preferred for the following relief/s: (i) for direction to the Respondent authorities to
Patna High Court CWJC No.5301 of 2026(2) dt.14-05-2026 2/2 cancel the licence of Saw Mill M/S Durga Trading (Saw Mill) Company which is running in the name of Kartik Mehta son of Ram Krishna Mehta Resident of Village Shahpur- Gwalpera, P.S.- Gwalpura, District- Madhepura (i.e. Respondent no.8), which is not in accordance with law, procedures, regulation of the Saw Mill Licence; (ii) for issuance of any other writ or writs, order or orders to which petitioner is found to be entitled in the facts and circums-tances of the case.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he shall be approaching the respondent no. 09, the Bihar State Pollution Control Board for the redressal of the grievance.
4. Granting the said liberty, the writ petition is
disposed of.
Ravi/ S. Prasad (Rajiv Roy, J) U