Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15877 (ALL)

SUKHVEER SINGH FAUJI v. STATE OF U.P.

BAIL/35791/2026 · 2026-10-06

Krishan Pahal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 35791 of 2026 Court No. - 68 HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J. 1. List has been revised. 2. Heard Sri Suraj Pandey, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Deepak Kumar Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material placed on record. 3. Applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No.0148 of 2026, under Section 109(1), 317(2), 317(5) B.N.S. and 3, 25 & 27 of Arms Act, 1959, Police Station- Murshaan, District- Hathras, during the pendency of trial. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant has argued that the allegations are per se false. The applicant was wanted in a case and has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the police to show good work. The instant case is of police-party firing no injury case; rather, the applicant sustained gunshot injuries to both lower limbs in the cross-fire by the police. The applicant has yet to apply for bail in the predicate offence. He is in jail since 22.06.2026 and undertakes to cooperate with the trial and not misuse the liberty of bail. 5. Learned A.G.A. has vehemently opposed the bail application but the submissions raised by the learned counsel for the applicant could not be disputed. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the evidence on record, taking into consideration that it is a police party firing no injury case, rather the Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ashutosh Mishra, Suraj Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Sukhveer Singh Fauji .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) applicant sustained gunshot injuries in the cross-fire by the police, and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, prima-facie the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed. 7. Let the applicant- Sukhveer Singh Fauji, be released on bail in the aforementioned case crime on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to verification of sureties, with the conditions that he shall not tamper with evidence or intimidate witnesses and shall appear before the trial court as required. 8. Breach of any condition shall entail cancellation of bail. The observations herein shall not affect the trial on merits. October 7, 2026 (Ravi Kant) BAIL No. 35791 of 2026 2 (Krishan Pahal,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAVI KANT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad