SRI RAM BAHADUR CHETRI ALIAS BHAI AND ANR v. THE STATE OF ASSAM
Bail Appln./3114/2026 · 2026-10-04
Shamima Jahan
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 15876 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 15876 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010220582026
2026:GAU-AS:14828
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./3114/2026 SRI RAM BAHADUR CHETRI ALIAS BHAI AND ANR S/O KEDARNATH CHETRI, R/O 2 NO NAHARBARI, MAZBAT, PS MAZBAT, DIST UDALGURI, ASSAM 2: ASHIF KHAN ALIAS TUTU S/O LT ADAM KHAN R/O 1 NAHARBARI MAZBAT PS MAZBAT DIST UDALGUR VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE LD PP Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A BHATTACHARYA, S J BASAK,MR. A BHATTACHARJEE Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM,
BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SHAMIMA JAHAN ORDER Date : 05.10.2026 Heard Mr. A. Bhattacharya, the learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. A. Begum, the learned APP for the State of Assam. Page No.# 2/3
2. By this application, the petitioners have pleaded for bail in connection with Jalukbari P.S. Case No. 299 of 2026, registered under Section 303(2) of BNS
2023. 3. The FIR in connection with which the petitioners were arrested on 16.09.2026, was lodged by one, Imran, Ahmed, stating inter alia, that, he had parked his Eeco car in front of the Guwahati college, Boripara, and that, it was stolen there from, on the day of lodging on the ejahar. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that, during interrogation, the police arrested the petitioners only on the statement made by the prime accused of the offence. 4 On the other hand, Ms. A. Begum, the learned APP for the State, submits that, it has been revealed during the investigation that petitioners, along with others, are involved in the offence of stealing vehicle and selling them in other states. 5. On consideration of the submissions made by the learned counsels, more so in view of the fact that it has been stated in the forwarding report that, one of the prime accused, namely Raju Deka, had named the petitioners, that they are also involved and also on the ground that, the petitioners were inside the jail for the last 16 days, this court enlarges the petitioner on bail on furnishing of a bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) each with one local surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the C.J.M, Kamup (M) Assam under the following conditions : (i) The petitioners shall positively appear before the I.O. and the Trial Court as and when call for.
Page No.# 3/3 (ii) The petitioners shall not hamper and tamper with the evidence of the case, and/or influence the witness connected with the case; and (iii) The petitioners shall not leave their residence without prior permission of the Investigating Officer. 6. The Bail Applications stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant