Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15872 (JHR)

DOLLY PRAVEEN v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./1917/2026 · 2026-06-09

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2026:JHHC:16564 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 1917 of 2026 ------ Dolly Parveen, wife of Md. Kadim Khan, aged about 43 years, resident of H- Road, Muslim Basti, P.O.-Adityapur, P.S.- Adityapur, Dist.-Seraikella-Kharsawan … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Vikash Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Naveen Kr. Ganjhu, Addl. P.P. ------ Order No.05 Dated- 09.06.2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with Adityapur P.S. Case No.303 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under sections 17(b)/21(b)/27(a) of the N.D.P.S. Act. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was involved in illegal selling of brown sugar which is known as heroin along with her son Shahbaaz Khan. It is next submitted that from the co- accused-Shahbaaz Khan heroin weighing 67.75 grams was recovered and from the house of the petitioner, 33.68 grams of brown sugar was recovered but the petitioner fled away from her house. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false and the total seized heroin comes under intermediate quantity. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 31.01.2026, as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 16 of the bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case and further undertakes that she will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail. The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the abovenamed petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.S.J.-I, Seraikella, in connection with Adityapur P.S. Case No.303 of 2025 with the condition that the petitioner will cooperate with the trial of the case and will furnish her mobile number and a copy of her Aadhar Card in the court below with the undertaking that she will not change her mobile number during the trial of the case, with further condition that she will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 09.06.2026 Gunjan-