Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15871 (RAJ)

ASRAF S/O SHERMOHAMMAD @ SHERU v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/1003/2026 · 2026-01-20

Pramil Kumar Mathur

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:2438] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1003/2026 Asraf S/o Shermohammad @ Sheru, Aged About 43 Years, R/o Bich Ka Bas, Odhara, Police Station Kishangarh Bas, District Khairthal-Tijara, Raj. (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Kishangarh Bas). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sumer Singh Ola For Respondent(s) For Complainant : : Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP Mr. Raunak Singhvi Mr. Anshuman Singh Champawat HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 20/01/2026 1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.321/2025 registered at Police Station Kishangarh Bas, District-Khairthal-Tijara for offences under Sections 189(2), 115(2), 126(2), 303(2) and 351(2) of BNS. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor and counsel for the complainant and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner and the complainant are neighbours, and that the present incident has arisen out of a civil dispute relating to garbage. He further submits that a cross-FIR has been lodged by the present petitioner. As per the FIR and the statements recorded during the course of investigation, no injury has been attributed to the [2026:RJ-JP:2438] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-1003/2026] present petitioner which can be designated as dangerous to life. The specific act of causing injuries dangerous to life has been attributed to the co-accused, namely Arshad. Co-accused- Aasmohammed and Shokin have been enlarged on bail by this Court on 07.01.2026. Petitioner is behind the bars since 01.10.2025. Charge-sheet has been filed. The trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, hence, the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor and counsel for the complainant have vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submission and material available on record and deliberating all the facts and circumstances of the case, and without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioner-Asraf S/o Shermohammad @ Sheru shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/ each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for his appearance before that Court on all the dates till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Arun/14