1 2026:CGHC:13396 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 3375 of 2020 1 - Smt. Gitanjali Sirmour W/o Shri Devendra Kumar Sirmour, Aged About 43 Years R/o In The House Of Cp Dipankar, House No. D1, Old Adarsh Nagar, Durg Po Durg Tahsil And District Durg Chhattisgarh., District : Durg, Chhattisgarh 2 - Lincon Sirmaur S/o Shri Devendra Kumar Sirmour, Aged About 18 Years R/o In The House Of Cp Dipankar, House No. D1, Old Adarsh Nagar, Durg Po Durg Tahsil And District Durg Chhattisgarh., District : Durg, Chhattisgarh 3 - Minor Dimple D/o Shri Devendra Kumar Sirmour, Aged About 13 Years Through Natural Guardian Mother Smt. Gitanjali Sirmaur, R/o In The House Of Cp Dipankar, House No. D1, Old Adarsh Nagar, Durg Po Durg Tahsil And District Durg Chhattisgarh., District : Durg, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Revenue And Disaster Management, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Post And Ps Mandir Hasaud, Raipur Chhattisgarh. HARNEET KAUR Digitally signed by HARNEET KAUR Date: 2026.03.23 11:17:50 +0530 2 2 - Collector Durg, District : Durg, Chhattisgarh 3 - Devendra Kumar Sirmour S/o Bodhrai Sirmour, Aged About 43 Years R/o In The House Of Cp Dipankar, House No. D1, Old Adarsh Nagar, Durg Po Durg Tahsil And District Durg Chhattisgarh., District : Durg, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Varun Sharma, Advocate For Respondents No. 1 & 2/State : Mr. H.A.P.S. Bhatia, Panel Lawyer SB - Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order on Board 20.03.2026 1. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioners be allowed to make a representation before the respondent No. 2 i.e. Collector, Durg for redressal of their grievance and respondent No. 2 be directed to decide their representation within a stipulated time. 2. Be that as it may, petitioners are allowed to make a representation before respondent No. 2 within three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and if such a representation is filed by the petitioners, the respondent No. 2 is directed to decide their 3 representation within four weeks from the date of filing of the said representation by passing a reasoned and speaking order, absolutely in accordance with law. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the matter. 3. In view of the aforesaid direction, this writ petition stands finally disposed of. No cost(s). Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Harneet