HUMAID KHAN S/O SHRI SAMIN KHAN @ AFSARDEEN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/1130/2026 · 2026-01-22
Praveer Bhatnagar
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 15869 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 15869 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:2968] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1130/2026 Humaid Khan S/o Shri Samin Khan @ Afsardeen, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Village Padla, Police Station Khoh, District Deeg. ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ankit Khandelwal, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rhishiraj Singh Rathore, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR
Order 22/01/2026
1. Apprehending his arrest in connection with FIR No.264/2024 registered at Police Station Khoh, District Deeg for the offences under Sections 303(2), 308(2), 313, 317(2), 317(4), 317(5), 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2) and 61(2)(a) of BNS and Sections 66-D of IT Act, the accused-petitioner has preferred this criminal misc. bail application under Section 482 of B.N.S.S.
2.
Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the matter is exclusively triable by Magistrate. The accused-petitioner is ready and willing to cooperate with the investigation and there are no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioner, therefore, anticipatory bail application of the accused-petitioner may be allowed.
3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the grant of anticipatory bail application.
4. Heard and perused the material available on the record.
[2026:RJ-JP:2968] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-1130/2026]
5. Considering the fact that the offences alleged against the petitioner is exclusively triable by Magistrate, the accused- petitioner is ready and willing to cooperate with the investigation and there are no criminal antecedents against the accused- petitioner, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to allow the anticipatory bail application of the accused-petitioner.
6. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that in the event of arrest of the accused-petitioner-Humaid Khan S/o Shri Samin Khan @ Afsardeen, in connection with FIR No.264/2024 registered at Police Station Khoh, District Deeg, he shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer of the concerned Police Station on the following conditions:- (i) that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii) that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and (iii) that the petitioner shall not leave India without previous permission of the court. (iv) that the petitioner would submit his Mobile phones and Sim Cards before the concerned Investigating Officer. (v) that the accused-petitioner would submit his contact details along with the present address to the concerned Investigating Officer. In case if the petitioner changes his address or mobile number, he shall submit the same before the concerned Investigating Officer.
(PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Ashwani Kr Srivastava /-15