Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15869 (KAR)

MR. VINOD KHANNA v. MRS. ANUSHA R

WP/8768/2024 · 2026-02-10

Chillakur Sumalatha

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:8000 WP No. 8768 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA WRIT PETITION NO.8768 OF 2024 (GM-FC) BETWEEN: MR. VINOD KHANNA, S/O LATE GUNA GOPALA KRISHNAN, AGED ABOUT 35 TEARS, PRESENTLY R/AT (TECH/1/AC), NO. 164/C, CANTONMENT RAILWAY, QUARTERS, RAILWAY STATION FRONT GATE, VASANTHNAGAR, BENGALURU - 560001. …PETITIONER (BY SMT. SWASTIKA SAI M., ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND: MRS. ANUSHA R., W/O VINOD KHANNA, D/O RAJENDRAN, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, PRESENTLY R/AT NO. 455/0, M G RAILWAY COLONY, MAGADI ROAD, Digitally signed by AASEEFA PARVEEN Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:8000 WP No. 8768 of 2024 BENGALURU - 560023. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. LAXMIKANTHA K. B., ADVOCATE) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER ON IA NO. 2 DTD. 9.02.2024 I.E ANNX-C IN ITS ENTIRETY PASSED BY THE HONBLE IV ADDL FAMILY COURT BENGALURU ON THE FILE CRL MISC NO. 185/2023 AWARDING INTERIM MAINTENANCE OF RS. 10,000/- AND ONE TIME LITIGATION EXPENSES OF RS.20,000 FURTHER DIRECTING THE RESPONDENT TO DEPOSIT THE ARREARS OF MAINTENANCE WITHIN 3 MONTHS FROM THE DATE OF THE SAID ORDER AND TO PAY THE FURTHER MAINTENANCE ON OR BEFORE THE 10TH OR EVERY MONTH. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING B-GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:8000 WP No. 8768 of 2024 ORAL ORDER No representation on petitioner's side on call. 2. Sri.Laxmikantha K.B., learned counsel for respondent submits that the petitioner is not evincing any interest in the matter and he is dragging on the proceedings. 3. On 21.01.2026 the following order was passed: "Ms. M.R.Shinde representing Sri. Swastika Sai M learned counsel on record for the petitioner seeks time. On the other hand Sri. Laxmikantha K.B learned counsel for respondent appears through video conference and submits that the petitioner is dragging on the matter and though sufficient time was granted by this Court, the petitioner has not chosen to make his submission. Record discloses justification in the submission thus made by learned counsel for the respondent. However to give fair opportunity, stand over to 10.02.2026. In case the petitioner fails to make his submission on the merits of the matter on the - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:8000 WP No. 8768 of 2024 said day, the writ petition will be dismissed for non prosecution." 4. Even though such an order was passed, the petitioner has not chosen to represent the matter. These facts reveal that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the writ petition. 5. Therefore, the writ petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (DR.CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA) JUDGE AP CT:TSM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 45