1 / 3 2026:CGHC:3816 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 736 of 2026 Anurag Sahu S/o Vinod Shankar Sahu Aged About 34 Years R/o - Near Main Canal Bridge Champa Road Janjgir District Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Skill Development, Technical Education And Employment Department Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Deputy Director Skill Development, Technical Education And Employment Department Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Director Directorate Of Technical Education Indrawati Bhawan, Naya Raipur Atal Nagar Raipur District Raipur (C.G.) 4 - Principal Government Polytechnic Raipur District Raipur (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Mr. Mateen Siddiqui, Advocate For State : Mr. Rishabh Bisen, Panel Lawyer S.B.: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge Order on Board 22/01/2026 1. Petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking following reliefs: Digitally signed by PRAVEEN KUMAR SINHA Date: 2026.01.24 16:51:03 +0530 2 / 3 “10.1 The Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent State to accept the joining of the petitioner & allow to perform his duty at Government Polytechnic Raipur District Raipur as per recommendation Dated 09.09.2025 of the Committee of Senior Secretary, GAD Raipur. 10.2 The Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent State to grant any other relief which this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in favour of the petitioner as per the facts & circumstance of the present case, in the ends of justice.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that pursuant to order Annexure P-2 dated 30.06.2025 petitioner who is holding post of Lecturer (Civil) and posted at Govt. Polytechnic, Raipur is transferred to Govt. Polytechnic Ambikapur. Aggrieved with order of transfer, petitioner has filed writ petition bearing WPS No.7402 of 2025 which was disposed of directing petitioner to submit representation to be decided by the competent authority in accordance with law. Accordingly petitioner submitted representation before the Committee constituted under Transfer Policy on 22.07.2025 and considering the grounds raised in representation, the Committee constituted under Transfer Policy has recommended for accepting the representation. However, till date State Govt. has not taken any decision on the recommendation of the Committee since 09.09.2025. 3. Learned counsel for the State submits that according to his instructions, decision on the recommendation made by Committee is still awaited. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and also perused the documents annexed along with writ petition. 3 / 3 5. It is not in dispute that petitioner is a Govt. servant. State Govt. have formulated a transfer policy dated 05.06.2025 for transferring the employees of State Govt. Under Clause 8 of the Transfer Policy provision is made for submitting representation before the Committee constituted by the State Govt. in this regard of Senior Secretaries. Petitioner, as provided under Clause -8 of Transfer Policy, has submitted representation before the Committee and the Committee vide its recommendation dated 09.09.2025 has recommended for accepting representation of petitioner, which means that grounds raised by petitioner was found acceptable to the Committee. Respondent-State is to take decision on recommendation of Committee constituted under Transfer Policy at the earliest. In this case, recommendation of Committee is of 09.09.2025 and almost 4 months have already elapsed. 6. In the aforementioned facts of case, respondent No.1 is directed to take decision on recommendation of Committee dated 09.09.2025 and to pass appropriate order on it, expeditiously, preferably within a further period of 2 weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. 7. With the aforementioned observation and direction writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Praveen