17 jdt. 06.01.2026 jb. WPA 22926 of 2024 (Sujit Mondal vs. State of West Bengal & Ors.) Mr. Dilip Kr. Samanta Mr. Biswapriya Samanta Mr. Suharto Palit Mr. Akash Kr. Chakraborty …. For the Petitioner Mr. Rajarshi Basu Mr. K. M. Hossain …. For the State Report submitted by the State is taken on record. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner purchased the property in question from the private respondent and was handed over possession of the same. On the very next day, the private respondent barged into the property and repossessed the same by ousting the petitioner therefrom. The petitioner lodged complaint before the police authority but to no effect. It appears from the report submitted by the State that pursuant to the complaint lodged by the petitioner preliminary enquiry was held by the police. It was found that the petitioner purchased an undemarcated property wherein there are other co-sharers including the private respondent. According to the police authority, the allegations made by the petitioner have not been substantiated. Upon consideration of the submission on behalf of the parties, this Court is of the view that in the event the petitioner is aggrieved by the steps taken by the police authority pursuant to the complaint lodged by him, he is at liberty to approach the jurisdictional Magistrate for redressal of his grievance. 2 The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. Since no affidavit has been invited, allegations contained in the writ petition shall be deemed not to have been admitted. Urgent certified website copy of the order, if applied for, be given to the parties on compliance of requisite formalities. (Suvra Ghosh, J.)