1 APHC010045642015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] MONDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2185/2015 Between: 1. B. ANANDA NAIDU, S/O LATE B. KODANDA NAIDU, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS,OCC: SPECIAL GRADE SUPERINTENDENT RTD., R/O D.NO.28-373/5, RAM NAGAR COLONY, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH ...PETITIONER AND 1. G SRINIVASA RAO, MANAGING DIRECTOR, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE CO-OPERATIVE RURAL IRRIGATION CORPORATION LTD., 5-10-193, HACA BHAVAN, 1ST FLOOR, OCC: PUBLIC GARDENS, HYDERABAD-04. 2. T VIJAYA KUMAR I/C, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, AGRICULTURE AND CO-OPERATIVE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, HYDERABAD 3. M V SESHAGIRI BABU, THE COMMISSIONER OF CO-OPERATION, 3RD FLOOR, GRUHA KALPA BUILDINGS, OPP: GANDHI BHAVAN, NAMPALLY, HYDERABAD. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to summon the respondents for willfully disobeying the orders 2 passed by the Hon'ble Court in W.P.M.P.No.32391 of 2015 in W.P.No.24951 of 2015, dt.10.08.2015 by not implementing the orders passed by the Hon'ble Court and punish the respondents herein for Contempt of courts Act and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. C H SATISH KUMAR Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. GP FOR COOPERATION (AP) 2. P R BALARAMI REDDY The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2185/2015 ORDER:- The contempt case has been filed for non-compliance with the Order dated 10.08.2015 passed in W.P.M.P.No.32391 of 2015 in W.P. No.24951 of 2015. 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, Mr.M.Babji, learned counsel representing on behalf of Mr.Ch.Satish Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, fairly submits that the main writ petition was disposed on 12.09.2024. In view of the disposal of the main writ petition, the petitioner is not inclined to pursue the present contempt proceedings against the respondents. 3. Accordingly, recording the above submission, the contempt case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all pending applications shall stand closed. ____________________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 23.02.2026 S D P 4 292 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2185/2015 23.02.2026 W S D P