- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13549 WP No. 783 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM WRIT PETITION NO. 783 OF 2026 (GM-POLICE) BETWEEN: 1. NAGARAJU AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, S/O MUNISWAMI @ MUNISHAMI @ CHINNAPPA NO.1115, NEAR ANJANEYA SWAMY TEMPLE BEGUR, BANGALORE-560068 V/O DATED 05.03.2026 PETITIONERS NO. 2 TO 4 ARE DELETED …PETITIONERS (BY SMT. RASHMI .S, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. SUMANA HEGDE, ADVOCATE; V/O DATED 05.03.2026 PETITIONERS NO. 2 TO 4 ARE DELETED) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY SOCIAL WELFARE DEPARTMENT NO.233, VIKASA SOUDHA DR AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU-560001. 2. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE DIRECTORATE OF CIVIL RIGHTS ENFORCEMENT (DCRE) PALACE ROAD, BENGALURU-560001. Digitally signed by NAGARAJA B M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13549 WP No. 783 of 2026 3. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE BENGALURU CITY DIRECTORATE OF CIVIL RIGHTS ENFORCEMENT (DCRE) SHANTINAGARA, BENGALURU-560027. 4. DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE-EAST BENGALURU CITY DIRECTORATE OF CIVIL RIGHTS ENFORCEMENT (DCRE), SHANTINAGARA BENGALURU-560027. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. VIKAS ROJIPURA, AGA) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT R-2 (ADGP-DCRE) TO INVESTIGATE OFFENCS UNDER SECTION 4(1) OF THE POA ACT AGAINST THE DELINQUENT POLICE OFFICERS AT ANNX-A AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM ORAL ORDER Learned AGA, on instructions, submits that the captioned writ petition does not survive for consideration in view of the fact that respondent No.4 has already submitted a report to respondent No.2 – the Director General of Police, for taking further course of action. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13549 WP No. 783 of 2026 2. Learned AGA further submits that the said report has already been placed before respondent No.2 on 12.01.2026. 3. In view of the submission that the report has already been submitted, respondent No.2 is directed to consider the said report and pass appropriate final orders in accordance with law within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 4. It is made clear that if the petitioner is still aggrieved after the passing of orders by respondent No.2, liberty is reserved to the petitioner to approach this Court in accordance with law. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM) JUDGE NBM List No.: 2 Sl No.: 4