2026:JHHC:16268 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 2704 of 2026 ------ 1. Vikash Yadav @ Vikash Kr. Yadav, aged about 27 years, son of Koushal Yadav, resident of Pachhiyari Kothia, P.S. Jasidih Saket, District Deoghar 2. Lalu Yadav, aged about 35 years, son of Khiro Yadav, resident of Village Chandpur, P.O. and P.S. Jasidih, District Deoghar .... .... …. Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI For the Petitioners : Mr. Amit Kumar Sinha, Advocate Mr. Kumar Rishab Anand, Advocate For the State : Ms. Anuradha Sahay, A.P.P. ------ 02/08.06.2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. 2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Jasidih P.S. Case No. 375 of 2025, registered for the offence under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 303(2), 308(3), 74, 351(2), 352, 324(4) and 3(5) of Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, pending in the court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Deoghar. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the petitioners were doing the levelling work by JCB machine on their own plot being Plot No.919 having area 01 acre. He next submits that the allegations are made of assault however, injury has not been found and that has come in the order of the learned Sessions Judge. On these grounds, he submits that anticipatory bail may kindly be granted. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer and submits that the allegations are there of carrying the said levelling work on the point of arms and the petitioners are having criminal antecedents. In that view of the matter, she submits that the anticipatory bail may kindly be rejected. 5. Considering that the said plot is said to be of the petitioners and the petitioners are the descendents of Raiyat, Biru Mahto, the allegation of assault are there however, in para 35 of the case dairy and it has been noted in the order of the learned Sessions Judge that only push was made 2026:JHHC:16268 by the petitioners and no injury is there and further, it is well settled that the criminal antecedent cannot be sole ground for either rejecting or allowing the anticipatory or regular bail application, in the attending facts and circumstances, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 6. Accordingly, the above-named petitioners are directed to surrender before the learned court within two weeks from today and in the event of their arrest or surrender, they shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Deoghar, in connection with Jasidih P.S. Case No. 375 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Anit Uploaded 10.06.2026