- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:7172 RSA No. 1392 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.1392 OF 2022 (DEC) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. SRINIVAS, S/O LATE NANJAPPA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/AT DASARAHALLI, KASABA HOBLI, HOSKOTE TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT-562114. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. K.V.RAGHAVENDRA REDDY, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI. NANJAPPA, S/O LATE DODDA MUNINANJAPPA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS. 2. SMT. RATHNAMMA, W/O LASKHMINARAYANAPPA, D/O LATE DODDA MUNINANJAPPA, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, PRESENTLY, R/AT NEELERI GRAMA, KASABA HOBLI, DEVANAHALLI TALUK-562114. 3. SMT. JAYAMMA, D/O LATE DODDA MUNINANJAPPA, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS. Digitally signed by DEVIKA M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:7172 RSA No. 1392 of 2022 4. SRI. NARAYANASWAMY, S/O LATE DODDA MUNINANJAPPA, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS. 5. SRI. SRINIVAS, S/O LATE DODDA MUNINANJAPPA, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS. 6. SRI. THAYAPPA, S/O LATE DODDA MUNIYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS. RESPONDENT NOS.1 AND 3 TO 6 ARE RESIDING AT DASARAHALLI, KASABA HOBLI, HOSKOTE TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. LAVANYA R, ADVOCATE R3) THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 04.07.2022 PASSED IN R.A.NO.6/2020 ON THE FILE OF THE IX ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, BENGALURU, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 13.12.2018 PASSED IN O.S.NO.288/2015 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HOSAKOTE. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:7172 RSA No. 1392 of 2022 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH ORAL JUDGMENT The appellant, respondent No.3 and their respective learned counsel are present before the Court. The appellant and respondent No.3 have filed the compromise petition under Order 23 Rule 3 of CPC. 2. The learned counsel for the appellant submits that in the original suit, respondent No.3 contested the matter and now respondent No.3 has agreed to give up her right to an extent of 2 guntas of land, which is morefully described in the schedule of the compromise petition. The respondent No.3 says that the appellant is in possession and enjoyment of the suit schedule property as absolute owner and revenue entries of the suit schedule property are standing in the name of respondent No.3 herein. Hence, respondent No.3 is entering into this compromise with the appellant herein. Both of them have settled the matter at the intervention of the panchayathdars and well-wishers of the appellant and respondent No.3. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:7172 RSA No. 1392 of 2022 3. The parties have understood the terms of the compromise. Hence, the compromise petition is accepted and the parties have also filed the joint verifying affidavit. Hence, the Regular Second Appeal is disposed of in terms of the compromise. 4. The Registry is directed to draw the decree in terms of the compromise petition. Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE MD List No.: 1 Sl No.: 5