ANIL KUMAR ALIAS ANIL YADAV v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
A.B.A./2950/2026 · 2026-06-09
Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 15843 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 15843 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[ 2026:JHHC:16544 ] -1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
A.B.A. No. 2950 of 2026
Anil Kumar @ Anil Yadav, Son of Sideshwar Yadav, aged about- 35 years, resident of village- Inderwa Basti, P.O.- Jhumri Telaiya, P.S.-Telaiya, District - Koderma.
..... … Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand
..... … Opposite Party
--------
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Diwakar Jha, Advocate. For the State
: Mr. Manoj Kumar Mishra, A.P.P. ------ 03/ 09.06.2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.
2.
The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Telaiya P.S. Case No. 373 of 2025, registered for the offence under Sections 303(2), 317(2), 317(5) and 3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, Rule-54 of Jharkhand Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 2004, Section 21(1)(5) of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957, Sections 33, 41 and 42 of Indian Forest Act and Sections 27 and 29 of the Wild Life Protection Act, pending in the court of learned ACJM, Koderma.
3.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and the name of the petitioner has come on the basis of confessional statement. He next submits that there is allegation of excavating Mica scrap and being carried in the truck in question. He further submits that the petitioner is neither the owner, nor the driver as well as not the helper of the said truck. He then submits that the petitioner is having no criminal antecedent and disclosure to that effect has been made in para-20 of the
[ 2026:JHHC:16544 ] -2-
petition.
4.
Learned A.P.P. appearing for the State has opposed the prayer and submits that the name of the petitioner has come on the basis of confessional statement.
5.
Considering that the name of the petitioner has come on the basis of confessional statement and further it has been pointed out that the petitioner is neither the owner, nor the driver as well as not the helper of the truck in question, on which, the Mica scrap was being carried and also the petitioner is having no criminal antecedent and disclosure to that effect has been made in para-20 of the petition and in the attending facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
6.
Accordingly, the above-named petitioner is directed to surrender before the learned Court within three weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrender, he shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M., Koderma, in connection with Telaiya P.S. Case No. 373 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
(Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated:-09.06.2026 Amitesh/-