[2026:RJ-JP:3106] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 110/2026 1. Smt. Suman Vaishnav Daughter Of Bhagavati Das, Wife Of Shubham Kumar Dadhich, Aged About 24 Years, Resident Of At Present Resident Of Village Narodara Laxmangarh, District Sikar (Raj.) 2. Shubham Dadhich Son Of Suresh Kumar Dadhich, Aged About 27 Years, Resident Of At Present Resident Of Village Narodara Laxmangarh, District Sikar (Raj.) ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through PP 2. The Director General Of Police, Police Head Quarter, Lal Kothi, Jaipur (Raj.) 3. Superintendent Of Police, Sikar, District Sikar (Raj.) 4. SHO Police Station Laxmangarh, District Sikar (Raj.) 5. Raju Devi Wife Of Bhagwati Das, Resident Of Modi Joshiya Teh Luni District Jodhpur (Raj. 6. Bhomdas Son Of Chimandas Vashnav, Resident Of Resident Of Village Rajgarh Tehsil Shergarh, District Jodhpur (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sumer Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Punia, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 22/01/2026 1. Defects pointed out by the Registry are overruled. 2. Petitioners are major and present in person. They have duly been identified by their counsel. 3. This criminal writ petition has been filed by petitioners seeking protection from the private respondent Nos.5 & 6 as they are apprehending danger to their life and liberty at the hands of private respondents. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that both the petitioners are mature enough to take decision of their life. He [2026:RJ-JP:3106] (2 of 2) [CRLW-110/2026] submits that petitioners have entered into marriage as per Hindu Rites and Customs at Arya Samaj Sansthan, Lal Kothi, Tonk, Jaipur on 24.12.2025 and same has been registered on 24.12.2025. The certificate of registration of marriage of the petitioners is annexed with this petition. Counsel further submits that petitioners are living peacefully as husband and wife but respondent Nos.5 & 6 are not happy with their marriage and petitioners are receiving continuous threats from the private respondents, so they prayed for protection. 5. In view of the above factual averments, petitioners are directed to file appropriate application seeking protection before respondent No.4-Station House Officer, Police Station, Laxmangarh, District Sikar (Raj.) and respondent no.4 is directed to provide protection to the petitioners, if any application is filed before him and he would ensure that no harm is caused to the petitioners. 6. The criminal writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of. 7. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. 8. However, it is made clear that this order will not affect the civil/ criminal proceedings, if any, in the present matter. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J CHARU SONI /242