HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:7854 WP No. 19021 of 2022 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU WRIT PETITION NO. 19021 OF 2022 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: SRI. S.K SEETHARAMU S/O LATE S.H. KRISHNASWAMY AGED ABOUT 85 YEARS R/O NO.763, 1ST FLOOR A-BLOCK, SAHAKARNAGAR BANGALORE-560 092 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SAGAR B.B., ADVOCATE(ABSENT)) AND: 1. SMT BALAKKA W/O SRINIVASALU AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS R/AT SOMANDEPALLI VILLAGE PENUKONDA TALUK ANANTHPUR DISTRICT -510051 2. SMT. LAKSHMIDEVAMMA W/O GOVINDAPPA AGE ABOUT 53 YEARS R/AT SHANTHINAGAR PAVGADA TOWN PAVGADA TALUK -561202 3. SMT. LALITHAMMA W/O CHALAPATHI AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS R/AT APPAJIHALLI VILLAGE NAGALAMADIKE HOBLI, PAVGADA TLAUK -561202 HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:7854 WP No. 19021 of 2022 -2- 4. SMT. PADMA W/O LATE VENKATESHAPPA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS 5. SRI. JAGGU S/O LATE VENKATESHAPPA AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS 6. SRI. DINESH S/O LATE VENKATESHAPPA AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS RESPONDENT NO 4 TO 6 ARE RESIDENTS OF BABAIAH TEMPLE STREET, WAY TO PAVGADA HILLOCK, PAVGADA TOWN PAVGADA TALUK-561 202 7. SMT. ALUVELAMMA W/O T. NARAYANAPPA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS R/AT APPAJIHALLI VILLAGE NAGALAMADIKE HOBLI, PAVGADA TALUK-561202 8. SMT. NAGARATHNAMMA D/O BHEEMANAGOWDA AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS R/AT 237, 5TH WARD KAMALAPURA, HOSPET TALUK BELLARY DISTRICT-583 101 …RESPONDENTS (R2, R3, R7 & R8 ARE SERVED) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 8TH FEBRUARY 2022 PASSED IN F.D.P.NO 2/2015 ON IA NO.II AND III PENDING ON THE FILE OF PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC PAVGADA VIDE ANNEXURE H. HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:7854 WP No. 19021 of 2022 -3- THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU ORAL ORDER 1. None appears for the petitioner. 2. On the last date of hearing, this Court had passed the following: “1. None appears for respondent Nos 2, 3, 7 & 8. Respondent No. 5 has since expired while respondents 1, 4 and 6 have remained unserved. 2. The petitioner is directed to take steps within 3 days from today to take appropriate steps, failing which, the matter will be dismissed for non-prosecution.” 3. The report of the Registry is that despite repeated directions, process fee has not been filed. 4. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. (TARA VITASTA GANJU) JUDGE NR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 30 Digitally signed by TARA VITASTA GANJU Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNTAKA