Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15840 (RAJ)

SAPAT KHAN S/O ROOPU KHAN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/1063/2026 · 2026-01-23

Ganesh Ram Meena

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:3257] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1063/2026 Sapat Khan S/o Roopu Khan, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Ranikheda Police Thana Ramgarh District Alwar Rajasthan. (At Present Confined At District Jail Alwar). ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Faziya G. Khan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sudesh Saini, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 23/01/2026 1. This bail application has been filed by the petitioner under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No.363/2014 registered at Police Station Kathumar, District Alwar for the offence punishable u/S 279, 337 & 304(A) IPC. 2. Heard and considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the accused petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor. 3. Initially a case was registered against the accused petitioner u/S 279, 337 & 304(A) IPC. The accused petitioner was enlarged on regular bail. During the trial proceedings, the petitioner could not appear before the trial Court on 04.04.2017 and his bail bond and sureties were forfeited. [2026:RJ-JP:3257] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-1063/2026] 4. Learned counsel for the accused petitioner submitted that the accused petitioner had gone for earning his livelihood and the lawyer of the accused petitioner had assured him that whenever he would be required for the trial, he would be called and therefore the accused petitioner was in impression that whenever his lawyer will call him, he will appear before the trial Court. The accused petitioner is said to be in custody since 08.01.2026. 5. Taking into consideration the allegation against the accused petitioner and the fact that he is in custody since 08.01.2026, this Court, without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the accused petitioners on bail. 6. Accordingly, this bail application is allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner shall be released on bail provided that he furnishes a personal bonds in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac Only), together with two sureties in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court or any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J Gaurav Srivastava /144