Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15839 (CHH)

LALITA BANSHKAR v. RAJENDRA SHRIWAS @ SURAJ

CRR/633/2023 · 2026-01-21

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:3916 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRR No. 633 of 2023 1 - Lalita Banshkar D/o Parmeshwar Banskar Aged About 33 Years R/o In Front Of Bajrang Hotel, Suryawanshi Mohalla, Tifra, Bilaspur, Tahsil And District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Dhwanit S/o Rajendra Shriwas @ Suraj, Aged About 3 Months (Minor), Represented Through Mother And Legal Guardian Lalita Banskar, Aged About 33 Years, D/o Parmeshwar Banskar, R/o In Front Of Bajrang Hotel, Suryawanshi Mohalla, Tifra, Bilaspur, Tahsil And District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ... Applicant(s) versus 1 - Rajendra Shriwas @ Suraj S/o Babulal Shriwas Aged About 35 Years R/o Near Janji Talab, Sarkanda, Bilaspur, Tahsil And District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Lata Shriwas W/o Rajendra Shriwas @ Suraj Aged About 30 Years R/o Near Janji Talab, Sarkanda, Bilaspur, Tahsil And District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondent(s) ______________________________________________________ For Applicants : Mr. Ayush Verma, Advocate. For Respondents : Mr. Himanshu Yadu, Advocate. Hon'ble Mr. Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Order on Board KUNAL DEWANGAN Digitally signed by KUNAL DEWANGAN 2 22.01.2026 1. Heard Mr. Ayush Verma, learned counsel appearing for the applicants. Also heard Mr. Himanshu Yadu, learned counsel for the respondents. 2. By way of this revision, the applicants have prayed for following relief:- “It is therefore, most respectfully prayed that this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to set-aside the impugned order dated 20.04.2023 and allow the application filed by the applicants for conducting D.N.A. Test, in the interest of justice.” 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the case has become infructuous. 4. Accordingly, the present criminal revision is dismissed as having become infructuous without giving any further liberty. 5. The ofÏce is directed to send a certified copy of this order to the Family Court concerned for necessary information and compliance. Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice Kunal