Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15838 (PNJ)

RAJESH KALYANA v. UT OF CHANDIGARH AND OTHERS

CRWP/3673/2026 · 2026-04-02

Surya Partap Singh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRWP-3673 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 121 RAJESH KALYANA STATE OF CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present: SURYA PARTA directions to the respondent petitioner, whereby the petitioner has approached the respondent No.2 for grant of protection of his life and liberty. 2. petitioner has filed the representation before the respondent No. respondent No. stipulated time. 3. 3673-2026 (O&M) 8587 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA CHANDIGARH RAJESH KALYANA VERSUS STATE OF U.T. CHANDIGARH & ORS. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA Mr. Jagtar Kureel, Advocate Mr. Satish Kumar, Addl. P.P., U.T. Chandigarh. PARTAP SINGH, J (ORAL) The instant petition has been filed by the petitioner for directions to the respondent No.2 to decide the representation filed by the petitioner, whereby the petitioner has approached the respondent No.2 for grant of protection of his life and liberty. The learned counsel representing the petitioner submits that the petitioner has filed the representation dated before the respondent No.2. The learned counsel prays for directions to the respondent No.2 to decide the abovementioned representation within stipulated time. Notice of motion to respondents No.1 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-3673-2026 (O&M) DECIDED ON: 02.04.2026 .....PETITIONER VERSUS & ORS. .....RESPONDENT SURYA PARTAP SINGH for the petitioner. Mr. Satish Kumar, Addl. P.P., U.T. Chandigarh. The instant petition has been filed by the petitioner for decide the representation filed by the petitioner, whereby the petitioner has approached the respondent No.2 for The learned counsel representing the petitioner submits that the dated 12.03.2026 (Annexure P . The learned counsel prays for directions to the to decide the abovementioned representation within to respondents No.1 to 3. (O&M) 2026 .....PETITIONER .....RESPONDENTS The instant petition has been filed by the petitioner for decide the representation filed by the petitioner, whereby the petitioner has approached the respondent No.2 for The learned counsel representing the petitioner submits that the (Annexure P-6) . The learned counsel prays for directions to the to decide the abovementioned representation within the GAURAV THAKUR 2026.04.03 14:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-3673 State is hereby dispensed with. 5. hereby disposed of with a direction to the respondent No. representation of the petitioner within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of copy of instant order is however clarified that no finding is being returned, by this Court, with regard to merits of the contents of representation. The respondent No. be at liberty to make representation of the petitioner, and take an independent decision at his own level. Gaurav Thakur Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable 3673-2026 (O&M) 8587 Mr. Satish Kumar, Addl. P.P., U.T. Chandigarh is hereby dispensed with. Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, the present petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to the respondent No. epresentation of the petitioner (Annexure P within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of copy of instant order is however clarified that no finding is being returned, by this Court, with regard to merits of the contents of representation. The respondent No. be at liberty to make an independent assessment with regard to contents of representation of the petitioner, and take an independent decision at his own Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No 2 Mr. Satish Kumar, Addl. P.P., U.T. Chandigarh Hence service of notice upon the Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, the present petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.2 to decide the (Annexure P-6) by passing a speaking order within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of copy of instant order is however clarified that no finding is being returned, by this Court, with regard to merits of the contents of representation. The respondent No.2 shall an independent assessment with regard to contents of representation of the petitioner, and take an independent decision at his own :Yes/No : Yes/No upon the Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, the present petition is to decide the ) by passing a speaking order within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of copy of instant order It is however clarified that no finding is being returned, by this Court, with shall an independent assessment with regard to contents of representation of the petitioner, and take an independent decision at his own GAURAV THAKUR 2026.04.03 14:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document