Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:16430
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 3880 of 2026
Vakil Ansari, S/o Muslim Ansari
… … Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
… … Opp. Party
---
CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY ---
For the Petitioner
: Mr. Tarun Kumar No. 1, Advocate
For the State
: Mr. Shree Prakash Jha, Advocate
For the Informant
: Mr. Ayub Ansari, Advocate
---
03/9th June 2026
1.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody in connection with Bagodar P.S. Case No. 20/2026 for the offence registered under Sections 103(1), 238 r/w 3(5) of BNS, now said to have been pending in the court of learned J.M. Giridih.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is not named in the FIR and is not the family member of the victim. He submits that the name of the petitioner has transpired in the confessional statement of the mother-in-law of the victim and consequently he was arrested and his confessional statement was also recorded, but apart from that there is nothing against the petitioner to connect him with the alleged offence. He submits that the petitioner is in custody since 05.02.2026 having no criminal antecedent and the charge-sheet has already been submitted.
3.
Learned counsel for the State as well as the learned counsel for the informant has opposed the prayer for bail. However, the aforesaid
submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner are not in dispute.
4. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the aforesaid submissions and the fact that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent and the charge-sheet has already been submitted, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/-
2026:JHHC:16430
2
(Rs. Twenty-Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned J.M. Giridih in connection with Bagodar P.S. Case No. 20/2026, subject to the following conditions: - (i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner. (ii) The other bailor should be his close relative. (iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of his single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner. (iv) The petitioner would deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his Mobile Number before the learned court below, which he shall not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court. (v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned court below.
5. The instant bail application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions.
6. Let a copy of this order along with a copy of the affidavit filed with the bail petition be communicated to the court concerned through ‘e- mail/FAX’.
(Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.)
Dated: 09.06.2026
Uploaded On: 10.06.2026
Mukul/-