Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15832 (JHR)

NAGESHWAR PRASAD YADAV v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

WPC/3861/2026 · 2026-06-08

Sri Ananda Sen

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:16321 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI WP(C) No.3861 of 2026 ----- Nageshwar Prasad Yadav, Aged about- 58 years, S/o Late Mahesh Yadav, Resident of: Vill. Dihari, Hajipur Bhitta, P.O.- Mirzachowki, P.S.- Mufassil, District - Sahebganj - Pin-813208 (Jharkhand) … Petitioner(s). Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand. 2. Secretary, Building Construction Department of Jharkhand, 3rd Floor, Project Bhawan, PO+PS- Dhurwa, District Ranchi (Jharkhand). 3. Deputy Commissioner (D.C.), Collectorate Building, PO+PS Sahebganj, District - Sahebganj (Jharkhand) 4. District Land Acquisition Officer, Collectorate Building, PO+PS Sahebganj, District - Sahebganj (Jharkhand). 5. Engineer-in-Chief, Building Construction Department (Govt. of Jharkhand), PO+PS- Sahebganj, District Sahebganj (Jharkhand) 6. Regional Officer, NHAI Regional Office, C-129, Vidyalaya Marg, Road No. 2C, Ashok Nagar, PS- Argora, PO- Doranda, District- Ranchi. 7. Project Director, National Highways Authority of India (NHAI), PIU Sahebganj, 2nd Floor, SDO Kothi, Sakrugarh, PO+PS-Sahebganj, District -Sahebganj (Jharkhand). … Respondent(s). CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Aman Kumar, Advocate Mr. Sushil Yadav, Advocate For the State : Mr. A. Anand, AAG-III For the NHAI : Mrs. Sweety Topno, Advocate Mr. Amrit Raj Kisku, Advocate …...... 02 /08.06.2026: Heard, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State and learned counsel for the respondent-NHAI. 2. It is the case of the petitioner that his claim for compensation against the land and building of the petitioner which has been acquired for construction of National Highway under the National Highways Act, has not been considered. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has already preferred an application before the District Land 2026:JHHC:16321 2 Acquisition Officer for taking appropriate steps under the Act, but neither any order has been passed and nor any action has been taken pursuant to his representation. He submits that suffice it would be if a direction is given to the respondents to dispose of his representation and thereafter take appropriate steps in terms of the National Highways Act. 4. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that if the application of the petitioner is still pending, an appropriate order will be passed. 5. In view of the submissions of the learned counsel of the parties, I direct the petitioner to approach the District Land Acquisition Officer, Sahebganj for ventilating his grievance, who in turn will consider the grievance of the petitioner and pass appropriate order in terms of National Highways Act within eight weeks from today. 6. Accordingly, this writ petition stands disposed of. 7. Pending I.A., if any stands disposed of. (ANANDA SEN, J.) 08.06.2026 Tanuj/CP-2 Uploaded on 10.06.2026