HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 43501 of 2026 Court No. - 80 HON'BLE CHAWAN PRAKASH, J. 1. Heard Mr. Kumar Prajjwal, learned Counsel for the applicants and learned AGA for the State and perused the records. 2. The present application under Section 528 BNSS has been filed by the applicants with the following prayer: "It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to allow this application under Section 528 of BNSS and quash the charge- sheet dated 19.08.2023, cognizance cum summoning order dated 19.12.2023 as well as entire criminal proceedings in case по.93794/2023 (State of U.P. v. Rahul & Ors.) arising out of case crime по.796/2023 u/s 498-A, 504 IPC & 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act, Police Station Sahibabad, District Ghaziabad pending before the Court of Ld. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ghaziabad based on compromise dated 30.10.2025 reached between the applicant no.1 and applicant no.2, 3 & 4." 3. Learned Counsel for the applicants has submitted that the applicants and opposite party no.2 have compromised the dispute. It is further argued that the said compromise has also been verified by the concerned Trial Court, as such the proceedings against the applicants may be quashed. 4. Learned A.G.A. admitted the fact of compromise and stated that he has no objection if the proceeding of the aforesaid case are quashed against the applicants. 5. From the perusal of the record it is apparent that parties have entered into compromise and have settled their dispute amicably. 6. The law with regards to quashing of a case on the basis of settlement Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Anupam Tripathi, Kumar Prajjwal, Lakshya Jauhari, Shubham Kumar Dubey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Mansi Gupta And 3 Others .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) arrived between the parties is well settled. The Apex Court in the cases of (1) B.S. Joshi and others Vs. State of Haryana and another: (2003)4 SCC 675; (2) Nikhil Merchant Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation : (2008) 9 SCC 677; (3) Manoj Sharma Vs. State and others: ( 2008) 16 SCC 1; (4) Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab: (2012) 10 SCC 303; (5) Shaifullah and others Vs. State of U.P. And another: 2013 (83) ACC 278 and (6) Parbatbhai Ahir@Parbatbhai @ Bhimsinbhai Karmur and others Vs. State of Gujarat and another: (2017) 9 SCC 641 has held that the cases in which the parties have settled their grievances can be quashed. 7. Upon perusal of the records and the law laid down by the Apex Court on the subject, this is a fit case for exercising powers of this Court to quash the proceedings, as prayed for by the applicants. 8. The entire proceedings of the aforesaid case, insofar as the present to the present applicants, are hereby quashed. 9. The present application is allowed. October 7, 2026 Vijay NA528 No. 43501 of 2026 2 (Chawan Prakash,J.) Digitally signed by :- VIJAY KUMAR SAHU High Court of Judicature at Allahabad