- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:7121-DB RP No. 592 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND REVIEW PETITION NO. 592 OF 2024 IN WRIT APPEAL NO. 1420 OF 2024 (LA-KIADB) BETWEEN: 1. SUDHA LAKSHMAN W/O LATE LAKSHMAN GUPTA AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS R/A 581, LAKSHMAN ARCADE 3RD FLOOR, HMT LAYOUT VIDYARANYAPURA BENGALURU - 560 087 …PETITIONER (BY SRI CHETHAN A.C., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE DEPARTMENT VIKASA SOUDHA, BENGALURU - 560 001 2. THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS DEVELOPMENT BOARD REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER HAVING ITS OFFICE AT 4TH FLOOR, KHANIJA BHAVAN RACE COURSE ROAD BENGALURU - 560 001 Digitally signed by AMBIKA H B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:7121-DB RP No. 592 of 2024 3. THE SPECIAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS DEVELOPMENT BOARD HAVING HIS OFFICE AT 4TH FLOOR, KHANIJA BHAVAN RACE COURSE ROAD BENGALURU - 560 001 4. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS DEVELOPMENT BOARD HAVING HIS OFFICE AT 4TH FLOOR, KHANIJA BHAVAN RACE COURSE ROAD BENGALURU - 560 001 …RESPONDENTS (SMT. NAMITHA MAHESH B.G., AGA FOR R-1 & SMT. ANUPAMA BORDOLOI, ADVOCATE FOR R-2 TO 4) THE REVIEW PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 114 READ WITH ORDER XLVII RULE 1 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 PRAYING TO ALLOW THIS REVIEW PETITION BY REVIEW THE JUDGMENT DATED 13.11.2024 IN WRIT APPEAL NO.1420 OF 2024 DISMISSING THE WRIT APPEAL FIELD BY THE APPELLANT/ PETITIONER HEREIN AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE) 1. The review petitioner seeks to reagitate the appeal which was rejected in terms of the order dated 13.11.2024. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:7121-DB RP No. 592 of 2024 2. The review petitioner contends that the decision of the learned Single Judge which was subject matter of appeal in Writ Appeal No.1420/2024 (LA-KIADB) is erroneous as the challenge to the acquisition could not have been disposed of on the ground of delay. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the review petitioner submits that the delay is required to be considered in the context of the delay on the part of the acquiring authorities as well. It is apparent that the review petitioner seeks to reargue the writ appeal. We find no ground to allow the same. The review petition is, accordingly, dismissed. Sd/- (VIBHU BAKHRU) CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/- (K. V. ARAVIND) JUDGE AHB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 1