Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15826 (ALL)

RAMBABU @ ANAND YADAV v. STATE OF U.P.

BAIL/35702/2026 · 2026-10-06

Krishan Pahal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 35702 of 2026 Court No. - 68 HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J. 1. List has been revised. 2. Heard Sri Rajesh Singh Baish, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Ram Mohit Yadav, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 3. Applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No.83 of 2025, under Sections 3/5A/8/5B of Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act and Section 11 of Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, Police Station Iliya, District Chandauli, during the pendency of trial. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant has stated that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case. He has nothing to do with the said offence. Since no animal was slaughtered in the present case, no offence is made out under the Uttar Pradesh Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act, 1955. If at all any offence is disclosed, the same would fall only within the ambit of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960. The criminal history assigned to the applicant has been explained. The applicant is languishing in jail since 5.8.2026 and is ready to cooperate with trial. In case, the applicant is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail. 5. Per contra, learned A.G.A. has vehemently opposed the bail application, but the submissions raised by the learned counsel for the applicant could not be disputed. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, submissions made by Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Rajesh Singh Baish Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Rambabu @ Anand Yadav .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) learned counsel for the parties, the evidence on record, pending trial and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed. 7. Let the applicant- Rambabu @ Anand Yadav, be released on bail in the aforementioned case crime on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to verification of sureties, with the conditions that he shall not tamper with evidence or intimidate witnesses and shall appear before the trial court as required. 8. Breach of any condition shall entail cancellation of bail. The observations herein shall not affect the trial on merits. October 7, 2026 Vikas Verma BAIL No. 35702 of 2026 2 (Krishan Pahal,J.) Digitally signed by :- VIKAS VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad