Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15824 (JHR)

HARUN KHAN @ HARUN RASHID KHAN v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./2934/2026 · 2026-06-09

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:16456 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 2934 of 2026 ------ 1. Harun Khan @ Harun Rashid Khan, aged about 56 years, son of Late Makhan Khan 2. Firoj Khan, aged about 31 years, son of Late Hamid Khan @ Abdul Hamid Khan 3. Naukhej Sartaz, aged about 36 years, son of Sartaj Khan All are residents of Village Mandeya, P.O. and P.S. Chhatarpur, District Palamau .... .... …. Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI For the Petitioners : Mr. A.K. Chaturvedy, Advocate For the State : Mr. Rajesh Kumar, A.P.P. ------ 02/09.06.2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. 2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Chhatarpur P.S. Case No. 249 of 2025, registered under sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 109(1), 352, 351(3) of BNS, 2023, pending in the Court of learned J.M, Ist Class, Palamau. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case and there are case and counter case between the parties. He next submits that both the parties have received injury. He also submits that petitioners have got no criminal antecedent which is disclosed in para 19 of the petition. He next submits that the co-accused persons, in identical situation, have been granted anticipatory bail in A.B.A. No.2465 of 2026 and A.B.A. No.2888 of 2026. On these grounds, he submits that the petitioners may kindly be provided privilege of anticipatory bail. 4. Learned counsels for the State opposes the prayer and submits that allegations of assault are there. 5. Looking into the contents of F.I.R it transpires that allegations are there against accused Istiyak Khan and Akbar Khan. How these petitioners have assaulted and what injury has been received pursuant to assault of the petitioners, is not disclosed. There are case and counter case between the parties, both parties have received injury and further the petitioners 2026:JHHC:16456 have got no criminal antecedent which is disclosed in para 19 of the petition and the other co-accused persons have been granted anticipatory bail in the aforesaid A.B.As. 6. In the attending facts and circumstances of the case I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the above named, petitioners are directed to surrender before the learned court within two weeks from today and in the event of their surrender / arrest, the petitioners shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- (twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned J.M, Ist Class, Palamau, in connection with Chhatarpur P.S. Case No. 249 of 2025, subject to conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Anit Uploaded 10.06.2026