Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:2737] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 970/2026 Jafru S/o Shri Sirdara, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Gadhi Mewat Khoh, District Deeg. (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In District Jail Deeg). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mustak Ahmad For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Kumar Gupta, Addl.G.A. cum P.P.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Order 21/01/2026
1. The accused-petitioner has filed this bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S., arising out of F.I.R. No.317/2025 registered with the Police Station Sikari, District Deeg for offence under Sections 189(2), 121(1), 132, 303(2), 351(2), 351(3) and 125 of B.N.S., 2023 and Section 3 of Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984.
2.
Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that all the alleged offences are triable by the Magistrate. He also submits that there is no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioner and co-accused have already been enlarged on bail by Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 16.10.2025. He also submits that the accused-petitioner is
[2026:RJ-JP:2737] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-970/2026] in custody since 29.12.2025 and trial of the case will take time to conclude, therefore, he may be enlarged on bail.
3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.
4. Considered the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and also perused the material made available on record.
5. Taking into consideration the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner so also the fact that co-accused have already been enlarged on bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 16.10.2025 and the accused petitioner is in custody since 29.12.2025, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.
6. This bail application is, accordingly, allowed and it is
directed that accused-petitioner shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter be transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
(GANESH RAM MEENA),J ARTI SHARMA /158