[2026:RJ-JP:2966] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.1144/2026 Aasin Khan Alias Yasin S/o Pappu Khan, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Gurjaro Ka Mohalla, Village Sunderawali, Police Station And Tehsil Nagar, District Bharatpur, Presently Residing At Plot No. 83, Ishwar Nagar, Behind Kalwada Tehsil, Kalwar, Police Station Kalwar, Jaipur. (At Present Confined In District Jail Dausa, District Dausa). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mukesh Kumar Saini, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rhishiraj Singh Rathore, PP Mr. Anirudh Singh, Astt. Adv. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 22/01/2026 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 on behalf of accused-petitioner. The accused-petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.323/2025, registered at Police Station Kotwali (Dausa), District Dausa for the offence(s) under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 189(2), 3(5), 352, 351(2) and 351(3) of BNS. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. It is contended that the injuries sustained to injured Haider Ali were not found to be dangerous to life. The other co-accused Sonu @ Sunil @ Chandi whose name found mention in the FIR has already been enlarged on bail by this Court vide order dated 13.01.2026. The [2026:RJ-JP:2966] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-1144/2026] petitioner's name is not mentioned in the FIR and no identification parade was conducted. The accused-petitioner is in custody since 06.10.2025 and charge-sheet has already been submitted and the trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, the bail application of the accused-petitioner may be allowed. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the grant of bail application. 4. Heard and perused the material available on record. 5. Considering the fact that the name of the present petitioner is not mentioned in the FIR and other co-accused Sonu @ Sunil @ Chandi, whose name found mention in the FIR has already been enlarged on bail, therefore, without expressing anything on the merits of the case, this Court deems it proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 6. Accordingly, the instant bail application under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner- Aasin Khan Alias Yasin S/o Pappu Khan, in connection with FIR No.323/2025, registered at Police Station Kotwali (Dausa), District Dausa, shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the Court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. The learned trial Judge shall also verify the address and the contact details of the surety through concerned S.H.O. before releasing the accused-petitioner on bail. 7. The accused-petitioner is also directed to mark his presence on 25th of every month before the concerned Police Station till [2026:RJ-JP:2966] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-1144/2026] conclusion of the trial. The SHO of the concerned Police Station is directed to maintain a regular register marking the presence of the accused-petitioner and shall send the presence report of the accused-petitioner on the same day to the concerned trial Court every month without any delay. In case of any breach of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the accused-petitioner for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court. 8. The accused-petitioner is directed to submit his present address along with his mobile number to the concerned S.H.O. within 7 days from his release and the concerned S.H.O. shall verify the said address and the mobile number. In case if the petitioner changes his address or mobile number he shall submit the same before the concerned S.H.O. and also before the concerned learned trial Court. 9. A copy of this order shall be sent to the concerned S.H.O. for its strict compliance. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Ashwani Kr Srivastava /-11