Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1582 (GAU)

DR. DIMACHA DWIBRANG MWCHAHARY v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 8 ORS

WP(C)/52/2026 · 2026-01-27

Rajesh Mazumdar

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010000362026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/52/2026 DR. DIMACHA DWIBRANG MWCHAHARY SON OF LATE MAHENDRA MWCHAHARY, RESIDENT OF DUFFAOLU HADAM, KHWDWMGURI, BODOFA NWGWR, KWDWMTOLA, P.O. TITAGURI, P.S.AND DISTRICT- KOKRAJHAR, ASSAM- 783370. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 8 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARYTO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, DEPARTMENT OF HIGHER EDUCATION, DISPUR, KAMRUP METRO, GUWAHATI- 781006, ASSAM. 2:THE SECRETARY BODOLAND TERRITORIAL COUNCIL KOKRAJHAR ASSAM PIN- 783370. 3:THE DIRECTOR OF HIGHER EDUCATION KAHILIPARA GUWAHATI KAMRUP METRO ASSAM PIN- 781019. 4:THE DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION BODOLAND TERRITORIAL COUNCIL KOKRAJHAR ASSAM PIN- 783370. 5:THE KOKRAJHAR UNIVERSITY Page No.# 2/3 KOKRAJHAR BODOLAND TERRITORIAL COUNCIL ASSAM PIN- 783370 REPRESENTED BY ITS VICE CHANCELLOR. 6:THE VICE-CHANCELLOR THE KOKRAJHAR UNIVERSITY KOKRAJHAR BODOLAND TERRITORIAL COUNCIL ASSAM PIN- 783370. 7:THE REGISTRAR (IN-CHARGE) THE KOKRAJHAR UNIVERSITY KOKRAJHAR BODOLAND TERRITORIAL COUNCIL ASSAM PIN- 783370. 8:DR. BANABINA BRAHMA THE REGISTRAR (IN-CHARGE) THE KOKRAJHAR UNIVERSITY KOKRAJHAR BODOLAND TERRITORIAL COUNCIL ASSAM PIN- 783370. 9:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM GOVERNORS SECRETARIAT LOK BHAVAN GUWAHATI KAMRUP METRO ASSAM PIN- 781001 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M K CHOUDHURY, MR. S R RABHA,MR P BHARADWAJ,M RAHMAN Advocate for the Respondent : SC, HIGHER EDU, MR. D GOGOI (R-5,7),MR S BORTHAKUR(R- 5,7),SC, BTC Page No.# 3/3 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR ORDER Date : 28-01-2026 Mr. P. Bharadwaj, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that he is under instructions not to press this writ petition in its present form, and prays that the writ petition may be closed. There being no objection from the learned counsel for the respondents, the matter is closed as not pressed in its present form. Interim order, if any, shall stand vacated. JUDGE Comparing Assistant