[2026:RJ-JP:3307] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1249/2026 1. Bahadur S/o Ramdhan, Aged About 42 Years, R/o Teenmurti Dhindora Police Station Surauth District Karauli (At Present In Sub Jail, Hindauncity). 2. Vakeel S/o Shivsingh, Aged About 18 Years, R/o Teenmurti Dhindora Police Station Surauth District Karauli (At Present In Sub Jail, Hindauncity). 3. Vikesh S/o Dayal, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Teenmurti Dhindora Police Station Surauth District Karauli (At Present In Sub Jail, Hindauncity). 4. Ravi S/o Shivsingh, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Teenmurti Dhindora Police Station Surauth District Karauli (At Present In Sub Jail, Hindauncity). ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Javed Mohd. Khan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 23/01/2026 1. The petitioners have preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.376/2025 registered at Police Station Surauth, District-Karauli for offences under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 189(2) and 333 of BNS. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. He further [2026:RJ-JP:3307] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-1249/2026] submits that though there are allegations of causing injuries to the injured Dilip, Priyanka and Machla but no specific role has been attributed to the present petitioners. The injuries alleged to be dangerous to life are, in fact, attributed to the co-accused Dayal. The complainant has levelled only omnibus allegations against the present petitioners. Petitioner are behind the bars since 25.12.2025. Charge-sheet has been filed. The trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioners in further custody, hence, the bail application of the petitioners may be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submission and material available on record and deliberating all the facts and circumstances of the case, and without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioners. 6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioners-Bahadur S/o Ramdhan, Vakeel S/o Shivsingh, Vikesh S/o Dayal and Ravi S/o Shivsingh shall be released on bail on their furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/ each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for their appearance before that Court on all the dates till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Arun/175