LAXMAN SINGH S/O LATE. SH. HARNAATH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/1053/2026 · 2026-01-21
Pramil Kumar Mathur
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 15816 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 15816 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:2783] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1053/2026 Laxman Singh S/o Late. Sh. Harnaath, Aged About 37 Years, R/o House No. A-409, Shiv Colony, Bai Ji Kothi, Jhalana Dungari, Police Thana Gandhinagar, Jaipur. (At Present Confined In Central Jail Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sumit Khandelwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR
Order 21/01/2026
1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.246/2025 registered at Police Station Gandhi Nagar (Jaipur City (East), District-Jaipur City (East) for offences under Section 108 of BNS.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the petitioner resides in the same locality and had advanced some money as a loan to the deceased. On raising demand, deceased has issued a cheque to petitioner, which was dishonoured. The deceased ultimately committed suicide due to mental stress arisen out of heavy debts. There is no evidence of any active role or participation by the petitioner in the deceased's death. Petitioner
[2026:RJ-JP:2783] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-1053/2026] is behind the bars since 14.08.2025. Charge-sheet has been filed. The trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, hence, the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.
5. On consideration of the rival submission and material available on record and deliberating all the facts and circumstances of the case, and without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner.
6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioner-Laxman Singh S/o Late. Sh. Harnaath shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/ each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for his appearance before that Court on all the dates till conclusion of the trial.
(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Arun/9