1 2026:CGHC:3858 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 2962 of 2025 1 - Jay Sahu @ Jayendra Sahu (In Person) S/o Dhaniram Sahu Aged About 45 Years Occupation- Unemployed, Non- Preferred Communication Mode Address- Jay Home, Street- J, Adarsh Nagar, Mowa Raipur, Chhattisgarh, 492014, Preferred Communication Mode Email- Jay.Sahu1@Gmail.Com ... Petitioner versus 1 - CBI (Central Bureau of Investigation) Through Union of India, Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances And Pensions, Through Its Secretary, National Headquarters- C.G.O Complex, Near Jawaharlal Nehru Stadium, New Delhi And Regional Headquarters- Village- Dharampura, V.I.P. Road, Near P.T.S. Chowk, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, 490009. 2 - E.D. (Enforcement Directorate) Through Union Of India, Through Ministry Of Finance, National Headquarters - 6th Floor, Lok Nayak Bhawan, Khan Market, New Delhi- 110003 And Regional Headquarters- Raipur Zonal Office, 2nd Floor, Netaji Subhas Stadium, Moti Bagh, Raipur, Chhattisgarh-492001 3 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Chief Secretary, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, Chhattisgarh 4 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through S.H.O. Bilaigarh Police Station, Dist. Sarangarh-Bilaigarh, 493338. 5 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through S.H.O. Pandri (Mowa) Police Station, Raipur, 492004. HEERA LAL SAHU Digitally signed by HEERA LAL SAHU Date: 2026.01.22 16:19:30 +0530 2 6 - Hon’ble High Court C.G. (Deleted) As Per Hon’ble Court Order Dated 06-10-2025 And 10-11-2025. ... Respondents Petitioner in Person : Not appeared. For Respondent No. 1 : Mr. Vaibhav A. Goverdhan, Adv. For Respondent No. 2 : Ms. Laxmeen Kashyap, Adv. on behalf of Mr. Saurabh Pande, Adv. For State : Mr. Anish Tiwari, Dy. G.A. Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal Order on Board 22/01/2026 1. On 12.01.2026 and today also petitioner who was appearing as petitioner in person has not appeared. Through E-mail he sent a prayer for the withdrawal of this petition, but in the absence of the petitioner, the application sent through email cannot be considered. Thus, it appears that the petitioner is not interested in this case. 2. In the absence of any representation on behalf of the petitioner, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss the petition for want of prosecution. 3. Accordingly, the instant petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal) Judge H.L. Sahu