Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1581 (UTT)

RAJESH KUMAR v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPSS/21/2022 · 2026-03-12

Manoj Kumar Tiwari

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:UHC:1656 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPSS/21/2022 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Mr. Bharat Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. 2. Mr. Pradeep Hairiya, Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand / respondents. 3. According to the petitioner, he was engaged as Seasonal Collection Amin in District Haridwar, in 1996, however, his claim for regularisation is not being considered. The relief sought in the writ petition is as follows:- “(i) a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to Appoint/regularize the services of the petitioners on the post Collection Amin w.e.f. when the similarly situated persons were regularized by the respondents authorities.” 4. Having regard to the prayer made in the writ petition, this Court thinks that ends of justice would be met, if petitioner is permitted to make representation to the competent authority, highlighting his grievance. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty to petitioner to make representation to the District Magistrate. If he makes representation within two weeks from today, decision thereupon shall be taken, as per law, within four months thereafter. (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 12.03.2026 Navin NAVEEN CHANDRA Digitally signed by NAVEEN CHANDRA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=3be23325146e76a0642bdf4943fb9046f487df 006da82a131bb4e4403d3c0a15, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=18167EEFB5CA8CFFD421A103819DA87 5643AF56D653D095C6ED9A86DAAB21CE5, cn=NAVEEN CHANDRA Date: 2026.03.12 17:57:24 +05'30'