Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1581 (GAU)

SRI DULAL HIRA v. THE STATE OF ASSAM

I.A.(Crl.)/252/2026 · 2026-03-17

Michael Zothankhuma, Pranjal Das

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010047372026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/252/2026 SRI DULAL HIRA S/O LATE BIPLAB HIRA R/O - PACHATIYA WARD NO.2P.S MORIGAONDISTRICT MORIGAON, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP BY THE PP, ASSAM 2:RATNESWAR DAS S/O LATE MISIMAL DAS R/O BOGHORA SILSAKU P.S.MORIGAON DIST. MORIGAON ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A AHMED, Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, Linked Case : EC/0/0 SRI DULAL HIRA S/O BIPLAB HIRA2R/O- PACHATIYA WARD NO.2BRP.S MORIGAONDISTRICT MORIGAON ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP BY THE PP ASSAM Page No.# 2/2 ------------ Advocate for : AZAD AHMED Advocate for : appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRANJAL DAS ORDER Date : 18/03/2026 (Michael Zothankhuma, J) Mr. A. Ahmed, learned counsel for the applicant submits that there is a delay of 30 days in filing the appeal against the conviction of the appellant under section 366 IPC read with section 6 of the POCSO Act. Mr. R.R. Kaushik, learned APP, Assam, submits that he has got no objection to the delay being condoned. Accordingly, the delay of 30 days is condoned. Registry to list the appeal. IA is accordingly disposed of. JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant