Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15809 (BOM)

ARYAVYSYA SRIRAMA SAHAKARA SANGHA NIYAMATA v. STATE OF MAHARSAHTRA, AND ANR.

WP/779/2026 · 2026-09-30

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

130 Cri. WP-779-2026.odt 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.779 OF 2026 [Aryavysya Srirama Sahakara Sangha Niyamata .vs. State of Maharashtra and another] --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda Court's or Judge's orders of Coram, Appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Shri. Dhruv Sirpurkar, Advocate for Petitioner. Ms. S. S. Jachak, Addl. P. P. for Respondent/State. CORAM : URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE AND RAJ D. WAKODE, JJ. DATED : 30 th SEPTEMBER, 2026. 1. Heard Shri. Dhruv Sirpurkar, learned counsel for petitioner. 2. The petitioner - Registered Co-operative Society has approached this Court seeking a direction to respondent Nos.1 and 2 to de-freeze the petitioner’s bank account, which was debit frozen. 3. This Court, in view of the directions of the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India, had already taken a view that such relief as prayed for by the petitioner before this Court can very well be redressed as per the Grievance Redressal Module, which has come into force in view of the Standard Operating Procedure approved by the Ministry of Home Affairs on 2nd January, 2026. 4. In view of the above, we dispose of the present writ petition with a direction to respondent No.2 - Bank to refer the representation dated 29th June, 2026, which is at record page No.25 2026:BHC-NAG:13375-DB 130 Cri. WP-779-2026.odt 2 (Annexure - 6), to the Grievance Redressal Module as per the aforesaid SOP dated 2nd January, 2026, for necessary redressal of the grievance of the petitioner pertaining to the debit freezing of his bank account. The timeline as prescribed by the aforesaid SOP shall be scrupulously followed by respondent Nos.1 and 2 and the other authorities, namely, the District Grievance Officer and the State Grievance Officer. 5. The present writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of. (RAJ D. WAKODE, J.) (URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE, J.) TAMBE Signed by: Mr. Ashish Tambe Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 07/10/2026 18:34:18