Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15807 (RAJ)

ANKIT S/O RAMVILAS v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/1073/2026 · 2026-01-31

Pramil Kumar Mathur

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:4552] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1073/2026 Ankit S/o Ramvilas, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Chohanpura, Police Station Diholi, District Dholpur (Raj.) (At Present Confined At District Jail Dholpur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1810/2026 Suraj S/o Shri Holiram, Aged About 18 Years, Aged About 18 Years 6 Months, R/o Gopalpura, Police Station Dihauli, District Dholpur. (At Present Confined In District Jail Dholpur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Asad UL Haq Nooree Mr. Krishan Kumar Mahar Mr. Anil Jain Mr. Udit Sapra For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 31/01/2026 1. The petitioners have preferred these bail applications under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.550/2025 registered at Police Station-Mania, District-Dholpur for the offences under Sections 115(2) & 309(4) of BNS, 2023. [2026:RJ-JP:4552] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-1073/2026] 2. Since both the bail applications have arisen from common FIR, hence, they are being decided by this single order. 3. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in these case. He further submits that though the allegation against the present petitioners is for committing robbery but no test identification parade was conducted. Petitioners are behind the bars since 29.12.2025 without any criminal past. The trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioners in further custody, hence, the bail applications of the petitioners may be allowed. 5. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 6. On consideration of the rival submission and material available on record and deliberating all the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioners. 7. Accordingly, the bail applications under Section 483 B.N.S.S. are allowed and it is ordered that the petitioners-Ankit S/o Ramvilas & Suraj S/o Shri Holiram shall be released on bail on their furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned [2026:RJ-JP:4552] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-1073/2026] trial court for their appearance before that Court on all the dates till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Arun/149-150