( 2026:JHHC:16303 ) -1- A.B.A. No. 2676 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 2676 of 2026 Tahmid Ansari, aged about 20years, S/o Jainul Ansari, R/o Village- Hanhat, P.O. & P.S. Kairo, District- Lohardaga … Petitioner -Versus- The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ----- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI ----- For the Petitioner : Mr. Altamash Khan, Advocate For the State : Mr. Sardhu Mahto, A.P.P. ----- 05/08.06.2026 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Kairo P.S. Case No.34/2025, registered for the offence under Sections 140/3(5) of the BNS, pending in the Court of the learned S.D.J.M., Lohardaga. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case. He further submits that the petitioner is not involved in kidnapping as alleged by the informant. He then submits that co-accused has been granted regular bail by the Coordinate Bench of this Court. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposed the prayer and submits that the allegations are there of kidnapping and materials are there in the case diary, which has been considered by the learned Sessions Judge and in view of that, the prayer for anticipatory bail may kindly be rejected. 5. Considering that the parameters of deciding anticipatory bail application and bail application are different and the allegations are there against the petitioner of involvement in kidnapping and it has come in the order of the learned Sessions Judge that in para 67 of the original case diary, ( 2026:JHHC:16303 ) -2- A.B.A. No. 2676 of 2026 the S.D.P.O. Lohardaga has found the case true against the petitioner and in para 56 of the original case diary, it has been disclosed that the petitioner is having one criminal antecedent and in the attending facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner and, as such, his prayer for anticipatory bail is, hereby, rejected. 6. Accordingly, this application is dismissed. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated: 8th June, 2026 Ajay/